2.8 Assimetrias económica

V Congresso SEDES: Desenvolvimento Económico

[Recurso eletrónico] “A economia portuguesa registou um desempenho positivo nas últimas décadas do século XX. O crescimento médio verificado entre 1961 e 2000 foi de 4,44% ao ano, o que equivale a dizer que neste período o PIB português evoluiu a um ritmo que permitiu a sua duplicação a cada 16 anos. Todavia, entre 2001 e 2019 o crescimento ocorreu a um ritmo muito mais lento: apenas 0,73% ao ano em média. A este ritmo demorará 95 anos a duplicar a produção.”
[Retirado do Sumário Executivo de Alves, Carlos (coord.); Pereira, Paulo; Costa, Marta (2021). “Desenvolvimento Económico”. Grupo de Trabalho Desenvolvimento Económico, V Congresso SEDES, 23 de julho de 2021]

V Congresso SEDES: Desenvolvimento Económico Read More »

The Effects of Urban Concentration on Economic Growth

[Recurso eletrónico] The paper examines whether there is a significant relationship between economic growth and the degree of urban concentration, as measured by primacy, or the share of the largest metro area in national urban population. Is there reason to believe many countries have excessive primacy and how costly is excessive (or insufficient) primacy? Using GMM methods, the paper estimates growth effects, using a panel of 80-100 countries from 1960 to 1995. It also looks at the determinants of primacy and policy instruments that might be effective in reducing excessive primacy. The paper finds that there is a best degree of national urban primacy, which increases sharply up to a per capita income of about $5000 (PPP 1987 income), before declining modestly. The best degree of primacy declines with country scale. Error bands about estimated best degrees of primacy are generally tight. Growth losses from significantly non-optimal concentration are large and rise with income. Results are very robust. In a group of 72 countries in 1990, it appears that at least 24 have satisfactory primacy; at least 24 have significantly excessive primacy; and at least 5 countries have too little. What determines urban concentration? Econometric models show that urban concentration initially rises with income and then peaks around an income of $2400, before declining. Openness, or trade effects are modest. Similarly, the effects of a greater degree of political decentralization while significantly reducing urban concentration are quite modest. The key policy type variable affecting concentration is investment in inter-regional transport infrastructure. In particular, increases in the density of road networks significantly reduce primacy, with the effect rising with income. As a policy consideration, this takes heightened importance because growth losses from excessive primacy tend to rise with income. The effect on growth rates of investment in roads, through its effect on primacy, is highest in middle income countries.
[Retirado do Abstract de Henderson, J. Vernon (2000). “The Effects of Urban Concentration on Economic Growth”. In NBER Working Paper Series. January 2000]

The Effects of Urban Concentration on Economic Growth Read More »

Estudo sobre o Poder de Compra Concelhio 2015

[Recurso eletrónico] O INE divulga a 12ª edição do Estudo sobre o Poder de Compra Concelhio (EPCC) que integra informação estatística reportada ao ano de 2015, sendo as variáveis de base para este estudo relativizadas pela população residente, estimada pelo INE, para 31 de dezembro de 2015. O EPCC tem como objetivo caracterizar os municípios portugueses relativamente ao poder de compra numa aceção ampla de bem-estar material, a partir de um conjunto de variáveis e por recurso a um modelo de análise fatorial em componentes principais. A realização deste estudo visa contribuir para a oferta de informação ao nível do município através da disponibilização de
indicadores de síntese que traduzem o poder de compra manifestado nestes espaços geográficos. [Retirado de Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2017). “Estudo sobre o Poder de Compra Concelhio 2015”. Lisboa-Portugal]

Estudo sobre o Poder de Compra Concelhio 2015 Read More »

Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: A Panel Data Approach for OECD Countries

[Recurso eletrónico] The advantages and disadvantages of public sector decentralization are widely discussed in economics and political science. While some authors argue that decentralization leads to an optimal provision of public services and a promotion of economic growth, others emphasize the dangers of competition associated with decentralization between subnational governments especially for redistributive reasons. These authors argue that poorer regions could not compete for mobile factors with the richer ones and, therefore, poor regions would get poorer and rich regions richer. This paper studies empirically the impact of fiscal decentralization on regional disparities using panel data for 17 OECD countries from 1980 to 2001. As the measurement of decentralization and regional disparity is one of the main difficulties of this research, both are discussed extensively and different measurement concepts are elaborated. The findings of this study are that a high degree of decentralization is connected with low regional disparities. Hence, poor regions have no disadvantages from decentralization, quite the contrary.
[Retirado do Abstract de Lessman, Christian (2006). “Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: A Panel Data Approach for OECD Countries”. Ifo Working Paper No. 25 March 2006]

Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: A Panel Data Approach for OECD Countries Read More »

Scroll to Top

Concatedral de Miranda do Douro

A Catedral de Miranda do Douro surge no decurso da criação da Diocese em Miranda do Douro e respetiva elevação da vila a cidade no ano de 1545. O projeto insere-se na tipologia de Sés mandadas construir por D. João III, cujo investimento se reflete na escala da edificação, que se destaca entre a restante malha urbana. Com traça de Gonçalo de Torralva e Miguel de Arruda, as obras tiveram início em 1552. Deste período chegou ao presente o corpo da igreja, pelo que a fachada que hoje observamos resulta de uma campanha construtiva posterior. Classificada como Monumento Nacional desde 1910, é o símbolo maior de Miranda do Douro.